Search for: "Westminster Parole Board"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 6:41 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Williams & Ors v Redcard Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 466 (20 April 2011) Berezovsky & Anor v Edmiston & Company Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 431 (19 April 2011) Finurba Corporate Finance Ltd v Sipp SA & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 465 (20 April 2011) Okafor & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 499 (20 April 2011) Vestergaard Frandsen SA ( MVf3 APS) & Ors v Bestnet Europe Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 424 (20 April 2011) RK… [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
The appellant applied for judicial review of the decision, arguing that his rights under ECHR, art 5(4) were breached by recalling him to prison without giving him access to a Parole Board. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:25 pm
He did not ask the Parole Board to recommend clemency, and they did not. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:54 pm
Westminster has also scheduled a hearing this month on the issue. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
Ismailaj v The Parole Board of England & Wales & Anor [2011] EWHC 1020 (Admin) (20 April 2011) Man imprisoned for human trafficking was not entitled to oral parole board hearing. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:58 am
Others, including the Sex Offender Management Board, argue that certain laws – especially the 2,000-foot residency restriction – prevent offenders from rejoining society and increase their odds of violating parole. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:58 am
Others, including the Sex Offender Management Board, argue that certain laws – especially the 2,000-foot residency restriction – prevent offenders from rejoining society and increase their odds of violating parole. [read blog]
4 Mar 2010, 2:02 am
He is referring to forthcoming proceedings by the Parole Board. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
” And in R (Osborn) v Parole Board [2013] UKSC 61 [2013] 3 WLR 1020 the UKSC emphasised (in Lord Reed’s judgment at § 62) that the starting point in fundamental rights cases should be “our own legal principles rather than the judgments of the international court”. [read post]
